Thursday, March 27, 2014

Sports, Inequality, and the Downfall of Society

Sports, Inequality, and the Downfall of Society

This woman makes $50,000 annually for educating America's youth

This chubby man makes $31 million per year for grabbing his crotch, chewing tobacco, & occasionally swinging a bat


In 1930, Babe Ruth made $80,000 ($1,124,699.40 in today’s dollars), 6.25% more than the President at the time, Herbert Hoover (who was making $75,000 annually, or $1,054,405.69 in today’s money).  This was a surprising turn of events; a reporter asked Ruth about making more than the President, and he responded with, “Why not? I had a better year than he did."    

Indeed, Ruth, then the most famous athlete alive (with the likely exception of Jack Dempsey, who was able to draw crowds of 85,000, 91,000, and 120,000 people to his fights in the years preceding Ruth’s quote), had a salary roughly 12 times that of the average American income at the time, $6,613.   Noteworthy as well is that the President’s salary was 11.34 times the average income.  For comparison’s sake, in 2012, the President’s income was $400,000, and the average American salary was $42,693, (thus the President’s salary was 9.36 times that of the average American salary).  Also for comparison’s sake is the contract extension Miguel Cabrera of the Detroit Tigers signed today, for eight years and 248 MILLION DOLLARS, which comes out to $31 million per year. 

Over the course of an average season, which features 607 at bats, Cabrera will be earning $51,070 per at bat (and for the record, I hate myself for reading even one word about baseball, the least exciting “sport” ever invented).  The average first-year teacher earns $36,141.  Each Cabrera at bat is worth considerably more than a year of someone struggling to teach our children how to read, do math, learn about science, history, art, and write.  Mr. Cabrera’s salary is 77.5 TIMES that of the President of the United States, and 726.11 times that of the average American salary (using the 2012 numbers). 

I bring up these staggering figures not as a critique of the Detroit Tigers or Cabrera, but for two separate but important reasons.  Firstly, these numbers serve as another measure of the gap between rich and everyone else in this country, and secondly, to highlight the perverse relationship America has with its athletes. 

Starting with the former, discussion of the increasing gap between the (shrinking) middle class and the uber-rich is nothing new.  By now, everyone who cares about such things is well aware of the dearth of manufacturing jobs, the increased power of the .1% of the country, the ways in which Citizens United promotes the circumvention of the intent of democracy, the massive income and wealth disparities that plague our country, and the lack of social mobility which threatens this country’s ethos and future. 

The second point is less discussed, but perhaps at some point soon, that tacit silence will change.  Sports, like religion, are an opiate for the masses.  Anyone who has had to suffer the fate of listening to sports talk radio knows how insufferably dumb and emotional maniacal sports fans become when discussing “their” teams.  There is a difference between enjoying sports and letting sports take over one’s life, much like religion can be (theoretically) good in small doses, but in large doses, proves to be destructive.

At the current juncture, there is a détente between sports lunatics (fans, if you will) and the athletes.  Due to fantasy sports, people are able to feel as though they have some skin in the game, even while not playing.  Between “owning” players and cheering for “your” team, sports provide a nice vacation from real life.  In return for providing this escapism, fans are willing to simply accept that professional athletes deserve to be paid absolutely outlandish sums of money, which come from even richer team owners. 

Sports are the lowest common denominator; the only topic about which the doorman and the doctor feel comfortable discussing is the football game from the previous weekend.  This role as an important spoke in the societal wheel leads to the aforementioned tacit silence as it pertains to criticizing player salaries.  In my view, this uncritical jock-sniffing has a negative impact on society.  The decision to put athletes on a pedestal, and the pervasive saturation of sports in our already shallow culture, create a ripple effect.  Young kids, particularly those at risk and without strong support systems, easily fall into the trap of believing that they are destined for athletic success, and that playing on a team is the ultimate goal, rather than getting one’s degree.  Our propensity towards athlete hero worship means that the teacher working to educate is thought of as a lesser being than the running back.  If our kids believe that the sports world is just as important as the real world (where sadly 99.9999% of us work and reside), then schoolwork does not in and of itself have any more value than sports.  In effect, we are creating a nation of kids growing up watching ESPN, ESPN2, ESPNU, ESPN 360, FOX SPORTS 1, NBC SPORTS, etc etc., who believe that the breaking news bulletin on the bottom of the screen during Sportscenter is somehow something of import. 


Saturday, March 22, 2014

The Tinderization of America

The Tinderization of America


In my online dating magnum opus, written approximately one year ago, I discussed common pitfalls associated with the activity/sport/hobby (or whatever else you want to call it) in question.  That was before I was aware of Tinder, also known as the most fun app ever invented.   

Tinder has gone from an app with a sleazy reputation (created to be something like a straight version of Grindr) to a ubiquitous feature on the phones of most singles.   I have seen the following people on Tinder: elementary school classmates, high school classmates, college classmates, law school classmates, friends I know to be in serious relationships, and pictures of my friends in other people’s photos. 

I have seen Tinder used in the following places: the metro (must be Verizon), the bus (hold on with one hand, swipe with the other), birthday parties (makes a great game for everyone to judge others together—always a bonding activity), the workplace (taxpayer dollars well spent), public libraries (clicking yes or no requires less concentration than reading Shakespeare), the gym (great for an added burst of motivation between sets), etc.  My point is that the shame factor has dissipated in large part.  What does that mean for us as a society moving forward?  Will Tinder, as my uncle predicted, mean that nobody will ever get married? 

To break down my uncle’s query, we need to recognize what Tinder changes and doesn’t change.  Starting with the former, the app makes available a much larger pool of potential mates, which is a double-edged sword.  One could literally look through a hundred faces in the span of a few minutes, if one were so inclined.  This access to such a deep dating pool means that real quotes like these are possible from your friends:

“I just found one of my good friends who is married on tinder, and that was upsetting, even though I wondered previously if the two of them were swingers”

“Have you ever tindered through, that is, exhausted, all your matches?  It happens a lot here; it’s very depressing. It might be a small-town kind of problem.”

“Going for three (dates) in one nite, wish me luck”

“Ugh failed date 1 (of three) from last night is texting me”


It also means that the fear of losing someone with potential is lessened; in that regard, it makes the whole dating process more precarious, because it is harder to get through the initial phases.  On Tinder, everyone is new and exciting; it is so easy to lust after the next person and disregard what you already have (or what you are likely sharing with another suitor, to be more accurate).  The availability of new and shiny, combined with our artificially-shortened attention spans and addiction to our phones, create a recipe that is not necessarily a harbinger of long-term success.  Potential mates lose their intrinsic value because they are so easily replaced.  Your first date was ok but not great?  No need to explore further, there are six other first dates waiting in the wings. 

An additional impediment to reaching monogamy through Tinder is that if you meet someone on the app, there is a rebuttable presumption that both parties are seeing other people.  It is an unspoken rule not to ask the other party about this topic, and asking too soon can spell disaster.  Most people do not enjoy lying, and similarly do not enjoy telling (somewhat) significant others that they are sleeping around.  Most people additionally do not like to know they are sharing someone; it is a lose-lose, so don’t ask.  The trick is figuring out a way to transition from mass-dating to dating only one person, without the conversation coming too early or too late.  

However, despite these hurdles, the situation is not actually worse than it was in ye olden days.  One of the bedrocks of our democracy is freedom of speech, and in that realm, a controlling concept is the marketplace of ideas.  Similarly, Tinder presents a marketplace; after the newness factor of seeing many people of the opposite sex wears off, we are left with our emotions and desires, and the person who best satisfies those needs rises to the top.  Whether you meet someone on Tinder or at a bar or at a party, human desires remain the same; we want love, affection, sex, companionship, support, humor, and a challenge. 

Further negating the idea that Tinder makes serious relationships impossible is the sheer magnitude of choices, which, as I mentioned earlier, is a positive and a negative.  It is a positive because after one has become a seasoned dater (meaning becoming sufficiently jaded and calloused), one develops an eye for what one wants.  Once the buzzing whirr of the dating merry-go-round causes nausea rather than happiness, seeking an exit strategy becomes the primary objective.  In that vein, having experienced so many different wrong choices, it is easier to become more aware of the right choice, and more willing to claw to keep it, when it presents itself.  With that in mind, keep the faith, and with a little luck and persistence you may find yourselves deleting your Tinder accounts for good (whether you create a separate Facebook account to log into Tinder under a different name is a story for another day).